On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Sam wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:42 PM, denstar wrote: >> >> The Tea Party has a lot of a lot of things. Too many nutbags for my >> taste though. Which is a shame. "Co-opted" comes to mind, as in to >> take or assume for one's own use; appropriate. > > It's sad you see it that way but probably agree with J and G that > anyone not loving Obama is irrational or an idiot. I'm not saying > there aren't a few nutters amongst the tea-party, but you threw out > the entire crop.
The secret is moderation, my friend. =) You jump to "love" as quick as you dump folks in boxes. Heh, it's the Love Box. Where do you get love out of what they've said? Why blow things out of proportion? The Tea Party threw itself out. >>> Group hug for Obama lover >> >> Why does it always have to be all or nothing with you? G Money is >> (IMO) a floater, yet you attack him every time like he's a rabid >> supporter. Totally ignoring anything that doesn't fit your >> conception. > > He always cries he's in the middle than gets rabid if you don't love the O. > People in the middle don't insult people with different opinions, they > respect it. Coming from you that's pretty funny. "nut-uh, /they/ do that, I'm an angel!". =)p >> You kinda go after anyone (everyone?) who has the gall to not see >> things your way. It doesn't take much for you to just toss 'em in The >> Box. > > I go after anyone that calls people with different opinions idiots, > morons, molded and so on. > Why can't we disagree with out being looked down upon? You go after yourself then? You /so/ do that, /so/ often. "Obama lover", for instance? =) > And here you are going after me because I'm defending everyone that > wouldn't vote for Obama if the election were today. Do they have to > be idiots if they don't love him? Can't we all just get along :P You're railing against an imaginary thing tho. Who attacks people who don't like Obama? It's like you see O-boogymen everywhere. >> Is your idea of the middle, nothing? > > It's not a real place, everybody goes through it, few stay. That's deep! I posit that "balance" is a form of being in the middle. But not the "squish like grape" middle, Daniel San. =) >> Or even better, neo-cons? Oh, that was /them/ saying that. Not you, right? > > Neo-cons favor both sides more often than others. They pass through > the middle more often than others, it's still fairyland. The only > people that stay in the middle are the ones not paying attention. That > by the way is not an insult, just means they aren't that int I don't know that I even know what a neo-con is, now that you're saying you are one. =) I dig that you gotta pick a side tho. There's only two viable parties in our system. Too bad the Tea Party didn't have the balls to actually become a party and try to really shake shit up. =] :Den -- If our condition were truly happy, we would not seek diversion from it in order to make ourselves happy. Blai ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:330550 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
