No...he has always been personally against it, but realizing that not
everyone is a Christian of his flavor, not everyone is against it and as an
elected official, he has a duty to represent people of all faiths or lack
thereof...not just he folks in his church.  Religious issues do not belong
in politics.  He realizes that all people deserve the same rights, gay or
straight, even if he does not agree with same sex couples. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Sam [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 1:17 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: That was quick


On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Eric Roberts
<[email protected]> wrote:

> rather easily by a more conservative judge or Supreme court.  He wants a
> Congressional remedy that has a little more weight and solidity to it.

So he was for it before he was against it?
***********************
No...he has always been personally against it and stated it from the
beginning, but realizing that not everyone is a Christian of his flavoror
even a Christian at all, not everyone is against it and as an elected
official, he has a duty to represent people of all faiths or lack
thereof...not just he folks in his church.  Religious issues do not belong
in politics.  He realizes that all people deserve the same rights, gay or
straight, even if he does not agree with same sex couples.
*************************

> I see this more so on the
> conservative side of the aisle from the legislation that gets put forth by
> both sides and the legislation that gets blocked.

Of course you do. The blinders are working.
*************
When was the last time dems voted against unemployment benefits or tax
breaks for small businesses?  When was the last time Republicans did that?
I can think of several occasions just recently when republicans were very
vocal about voting against bills that would help the lower and middle class
and small businesses and were very vocal about measures that help their rich
buddies.  That's not blinders Sam.  If anyone, it you that has blinders on
since you apparently cannot see that.

> I know they're biased, just too lazy to follow the money this time.
> ***************
> Factcheck is part of the Annenberg project that is actually part of a
> conservative think tank.  Despite that, they do tend to smack down both
> sides.  Politifact is owned by the St. Petersburg Times (St. Petersburg,
FL)
> and has received awards for it's unbiased commentary.  I find just as much
> that I disagree with in their assessments as I agree with.
**********************
The Annenberg Project hired Bill Ayers who hired Obama. It's not your
fathers Annenberg Project.
St. Petersburg Time is a left wing paper much Like Wapo and NYT

OK...so they hired Bill Ayres...it doesn't mean that they are not a
conservative think tank.  Bill Ayres is an educator and he was part of an
educational project by the ABP.

St. Petersburg times is hardly Left wing...they have received Pulitzers
prizes for their work.  Not something that happens to partisan hacks.
*******************

> Either he is friendly to corps by giving them billions or he us
> unfriendly...pick a side Kris...

Yea Kris, pick a damn side!

I just want to throw this in while Kris is deciding...

Letting insurance and drug companies make laws wasn't what I had in mind.
*********************
Neither did we, but your buddies in the Republican party pushed that stuff.
If you are so against that, then why do you still support them?

*********************************

> If there was no crisis (i.e. Bush didn't tank the economy and allow us to
> lose millions of jobs) when Obama took over we would probably be at our
> usual 3-4% unemployment...maybe even less as Clinton did.

I think $5 trillion wasted proves you wrong.
***********
Wasted?  How's that?  It stemmed the job loss and brought the jobs back to
pre-Bush levels.  While unemployment is still lagging, it is getting better.
I can see that from the number of tech jobs coming my way.  Companies are
hiring.  I wonder if in the numbers, they include independent contract work
and other contract work?  My dad, who has been an IT recruiter for years
told me that a lot of companies are hiring 1099 folk because they are trying
to get around paying taxes and benefits and the state labor departments are
actually going after them for fraud.
************

> 1099 issue?  What issue?  DO you mean the one where they are more apt to
> hire independent contractors to get around having to pay employment taxes
> and benefits?

Any purchase over $600 needs a 1099 filed. That's a lot of paperwork
for all businesses and I think the need for 50k more IRS enforcers.

****************
Ah...ok...or at least an electronic way of doing so, this way it can be
automated.  
***************

> What was it like a year?
> ***********
> try about 5...and that lead right into another, so we never really did
fully
> recover

Hmmm started in 2000 we started to recover and then came 9/11. The
next year we were on to a full recovery.
But according to you the current problem was created on Clinton's watch.
**************
Nope...the bubble didn't burst until after Bush got into office followed up
by a huge loss in consumer confidence after the he was given the presidency
by the SCOTUS.
**************

> You should be worried about how we treat our prisoners of war...as that is
> how our soldiers will be treated when they are captured...not to mention
if
> we don’t treat them justly...we will be in violation of our own laws and
the
> Geneva Conventions.

If the left had there way we would never have a war, just surrender
and they'd have no reason to not l
*************
I would rather we err on the side of caution than act like John Wayne and
jump into illegal conflicts that take resources away from legit ones.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:330597
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to