it was ingenious! On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Jerry Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > It cannot be called terrorism because it was not an attack against a > civilian population with the intent of inciting terror above and beyond the > fear the incident itself caused. > > It was an attack against a military target, with no loss of life, who's > purpose was to delay the acquisition of nuclear weapons (of mass > destruction) > > It _was_ definitely cyber warfare. It was most likely a sneak attack. But it > certainly wasn't terrorism. > > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> If it was done by Israel, it cannot be called terrorism. >> >> On 15 December 2010 16:40, G Money <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> > Hmmmm.....if we can do it to them...they can do it to us. >> > >> > I fear this may only be the first salvo in what becomes a disastrous game >> > of >> > state-sponsored computer "terrorism". >> > >> > >> >> >> > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:332729 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
