But my using the adjective "Jewish" makes it a factor in the event or
implies that it was a factor. And the post body of "They are executing
congresswomen now?" Who's the "They"? Well, the they have to be in some way
connected to her being a congresswoman or being 'insert adjective here'.
Call it implication, call it speculation, call it accusation. It all comes
down to the same thing done by multiple so called news organizations. An
assumption of fact without any corroborating evidence. In other words,
commentary rather than news.

I really hate it when the media (or whoever) jumps without fact, especially
when their jumping has such an influence on so many others.

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Michael Dinowitz
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I wonder what the response would have been if I posted "Jewish
> congresswomen
> > shot in the head at point blank range".
>
> Sounds like an accurate description of what happened to me.  I fail to
> see why using an adjective to describe the victim matters at all.
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:333051
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to