You got it then, you're crazy if you think they're hand in hand related.. There was a massive solar flare just last month, did it trigger an earth quake?
*X-Rated Solar Flare * Monday's blast was the first X-level solar flare since December 2006X being the highest level of the flare-rating system. But at X2.2or 0.00022 watts per square meterthe Valentine's Day flare wasn't unexpectedly powerful. "It fits in just perfect" with forecasts that show the sun entering a period of increased activity, Pesnell said. The recent explosion, he added, has nothing on the giant blasts of the early 2000s. That most recent active period spawned the biggest solar flare on ever directly measured in November 2003a blast more than ten times as powerful as Monday's. Compared to that "big honker," he said, this week's flare "is pretty typicalexcept it was beautifully typical, because we saw it with SDO." Here's your neutrino: Emmerich opted to used one of the most unlikely candidates to kill Earth. After all, the neutrino is electrically neutral and it has minuscule mass. Also, the sun pumps out a lot of neutrinos -- the human body is bathed in50 trillion solar neutrinos every second<http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2007/neutrino.html> -- and just as many neutrinos can be found entering the Earth's crust on the sun-facing side of our planet as there are on the opposite side. The ghostly particles pass through our planet totally unimpeded. They are extremely weakly interacting particles that have zero effect on our everyday lives. They are very useful to scientists however, and many billions of dollars have been spent worldwide on building neutrino detectors that can sense distant supernovae. On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Ras Tafari <[email protected]> wrote: > > well... color me crazy... but... > > 1. major, massive solar flares have been ramping up, right? > 2. those coronal mass ejections send out lots of little neutrino's and > other pieces of energy that we really dont know how they affect things > (all the way) > 3. we've had more large quakes, etc in recent memory, than i can > recall in recent history, right? > > im just sayin... > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Greg Morphis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > No the Sun would have NO effect on the quakes, volcanoes or anything else > > like that. However I have a theory myself.. March 10th was Chuck Norris's > > birthday. And that could explain everything. Seriously though.. a solar > > flare is not going to cause an earthquake.. > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> There was a major class X1.5 solar flare on March 9, which is when the > >> first large quake of this swarm, a 7.2, hit Japan. > >> http://www.space.com/30-amazing-sun-photos-space.htm > >> > >> There was a also a NEO (1.6 LD) on the 11th. > >> http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/ca/ > >> > >> > >> There is also a supermoon on the 19th, but scientists claim no > >> causation for the earthquake: > >> > http://www.space.com/11105-supermoon-didnt-trigger-japan-earthquake.html > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Ras Tafari <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > >> > so, does the theory of sun emissions that we have had lately, explain > >> > these quakes, volcanoes, etc > >> > >> > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:335083 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
