And just so you don't lose the plot: If those major companies are not paying taxes, you cannot argue that taxes are preventing them from expanding, or hiring more workers.
On 6 April 2011 21:36, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote: > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jane-devin/many-us-corporations-not_b_135104.html > > "Americans learned that many corporations, including those with assets > over $250M, reported no tax liabilities. In fact, from 1998-2005, " > > So your point is irrelevant. The corporations that could contribute > the most through paying taxes, aren't. > So you could have a tax rate of 110%. It's irrelevant if those > companies aren't paying. > > On 6 April 2011 20:54, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > >> http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2011/03/31/no-april-fools-joke-u-s-now-world%E2%80%99s-highest-corporate-taxer/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:336040 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
