On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Gruss Gott <[email protected]> wrote: >
> > So in that sense, investigation over, case closed. > > For Ms. Palin's claim we've seen no such document. So let's see the > document with all of the qualifications mentioned above and call 'er a > day. What claim? I think you are comparing apples to Volkswagons. I do not think Trig is going to be running for public office anytime soon, so why would his birth certificate come into question? IIRC, one of the requirements for being president is that you need to be a 'natural born citizen', I do not recall any such requirement for a candidates children - so again, why does Trig's birth certificate matter? 'Birthers' have brought up the birth certificate thing to try and prove that Obama is not legally allowed to be president (as ridiculous as I think it is). I am not sure what the motivation is behind attacking Pailin and her children. If its to make her look more like an ass, I am realyl nto sure that is possible. Pailin does a perfectly fine job of that on her own. AS for it being 'ok' to go after her children because she brought them into the campaign, well, Obama did the same thing. He campaigned with his children. So would it be OK to be asking questions about their birth certificates? Personally, when it comes to politics, I think a candidate's family, anyone who is not legally an adult is off limits. -- Scott Stroz --------------- You can make things happen, you can watch things happen or you can wonder what the f*&k happened. - Cpt. Phil Harris http://xkcd.com/386 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:336659 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
