To me, this is the difference. If Pailin is not Trig's mother, she could still legally serve as president (as frightening as that may be).
If Obama is not a citizen(as unlikely as that may be), he cannot (as far as I understand) legally serve as president. Proving the former would only make her look like more of an ass. Proving the latter would have very far reaching effects - and I shudder to think of the fallout. I still fail to see how these are remotely related, even after pushing it through the 'Gruss FIlter'. I loathe Pailin, I really do. But let's leave her family (those still minors) out of it. Trig has done nothing wrong, its not his fault his mother is a bloody lunatic. On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Gruss Gott <[email protected]> wrote: > > Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> What claim? I think you are comparing apples to Volkswagons. I do not >> think Trig is going to be running for public office anytime soon, so >> why would his birth certificate come into question? >> > > It's really quite simple: Ms. Palin introduced him on the campaign > trail as her son. Any and all claims on the campaign trail should be > vigorously questioned. > > In contrast Mr. Obama did not ever bring up his citizenship on the > campaign trail. > > So I agree with your logic: > > The questioning of Mr. Obama should be dropped and we should insist on > seeing documentation from Ms. Palin's campaign claim > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:336666 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
