COnsidering links that Jerry ( I believe it was Jerry) posted about voter turnout in GA and IN after laws were enacted that required ID, actual data would disagree with you
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Eric Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > > Considering that was one of the many laws repealed in the south because it > disenfranchised voters...history would disagree with you. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Stroz [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 10:09 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: How states are rigging the 2012 election > > > I am against disenfranchising voters, I just don't agree that requiring an > ID disenfranchises voters. > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Eric Roberts > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Nothing has been debunked except the members of this list are unified >> in their stand against disentrancing voters. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 11:51 AM >> To: cf-community >> Subject: Re: How states are rigging the 2012 election >> >> >> "Thus states, countries, and cities should have a good record of who >> is possibly a voter." >> >> "Should" and actuality do not necessarily meet when it comes to >> bureaucracy on any level. >> >> >> "They might even ask you to have a neighbor or 2 vouche for you in >> case you don't have such bill." >> >> This doesn't work either. Wisconsin is ground zero for voting fraud. >> Probably due to the same day registration and the previously lax voter >> identification laws. One voting scam would be to take a person and >> let him claim to be a student. This student no longer lived in >> Wisconsin or the specific district (due to transfer, graduation, or >> drop out) but had not changed his or her address. Conveniently, the >> "student" would not have an ID. However, other residents of the district > could vouch for the "student". >> >> >> "But requiring an ID would therefore be unnecessary, punitive, and >> generally paranoid to the point of delusion" >> >> This has been debunked ad nauseum. At this point, you're arguing just >> to argue. >> >> >> J >> >> - >> >> I never thought this day would happen. . . . I won't have to work on >> putting gas in my car. I won't have to work at paying my mortgage. You >> know. If I help him, he's gonna help me. - Peggy Josep >> >> >> >> > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:339398 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
