I think that if someone were to take the time to look, the numbers would be as whacked out as in New Mexico. I suggest the publication did not because the numbers they reported made sense to them given its world view.
But that is speculation and no I will not be sucked into researching it. I have spent enough time talking to closed minds on this. On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > COnsidering links that Jerry ( I believe it was Jerry) posted about > voter turnout in GA and IN after laws were enacted that required ID, > actual data would disagree with you > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Eric Roberts > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Considering that was one of the many laws repealed in the south because it >> disenfranchised voters...history would disagree with you. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 10:09 PM >> To: cf-community >> Subject: Re: How states are rigging the 2012 election >> >> >> I am against disenfranchising voters, I just don't agree that requiring an >> ID disenfranchises voters. >> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Eric Roberts >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Nothing has been debunked except the members of this list are unified >>> in their stand against disentrancing voters. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 11:51 AM >>> To: cf-community >>> Subject: Re: How states are rigging the 2012 election >>> >>> >>> "Thus states, countries, and cities should have a good record of who >>> is possibly a voter." >>> >>> "Should" and actuality do not necessarily meet when it comes to >>> bureaucracy on any level. >>> >>> >>> "They might even ask you to have a neighbor or 2 vouche for you in >>> case you don't have such bill." >>> >>> This doesn't work either. Wisconsin is ground zero for voting fraud. >>> Probably due to the same day registration and the previously lax voter >>> identification laws. One voting scam would be to take a person and >>> let him claim to be a student. This student no longer lived in >>> Wisconsin or the specific district (due to transfer, graduation, or >>> drop out) but had not changed his or her address. Conveniently, the >>> "student" would not have an ID. However, other residents of the district >> could vouch for the "student". >>> >>> >>> "But requiring an ID would therefore be unnecessary, punitive, and >>> generally paranoid to the point of delusion" >>> >>> This has been debunked ad nauseum. At this point, you're arguing just >>> to argue. >>> >>> >>> J >>> >>> - >>> >>> I never thought this day would happen. . . . I won't have to work on >>> putting gas in my car. I won't have to work at paying my mortgage. You >>> know. If I help him, he's gonna help me. - Peggy Josep >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:339400 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
