Well, you know more about the proposal than I do, but I was sure I saw that somewhere. But ok. If it's entirely retailer-side you've got a regressive tax, is what you've got, right?
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Cameron Childress <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Y-e-e-s-s....Also there is apparently going to be some sort > > of tracking of who bought what to make sure these people don't pay too > > much. > > > > Nothing I have ever read indicates this. Though, the Federal government is > guaranteed to attempt to screw with the proposed format. > > Everything I have read shows it being entirely retailer-side with no > significant reporting requirements for individuals (thus the IRS size and > complexity reduction). > > -Cameron > > -- > Cameron Childress > -- > p: 678.637.5072 > im: cameroncf > facebook <http://www.facebook.com/cameroncf> | > twitter<http://twitter.com/cameronc> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:340095 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
