On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, you know more about the proposal than I do, but I was sure I saw that > somewhere. But ok. If it's entirely retailer-side you've got a regressive > tax, is what you've got, right? > Which I think was where we left off last time too... It would remain to be seen what really happens once it's enacted, but this study indicates that it would be more progressive than current tax system. http://www.beaconhill.org/FairTax2007/DistributionalAnalysisFairTaxBHI4-25-07.pdf You can skip to the table on page four if you don't feel like reading the entire paper. It shows the rich paying more taxes and buying less stuff and the poor paying less taxes and buying more stuff. -Cameron -- Cameron Childress -- p: 678.637.5072 im: cameroncf facebook <http://www.facebook.com/cameroncf> | twitter<http://twitter.com/cameronc> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:340098 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
