I understand its performance. My performance suffered when the size of my pst got too large so I had to break it up into smaller psts for Outlook to regain its performance.
"Raymond Camden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/07/2002 09:15:26 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: (bcc: Scott Raley/LPEC/ASD/SEMCORINC) Subject: RE: Email Clients Well, again, it's not size - it's performance - especially when my system is busy in general. Maybe I'm expecting too much out of my system (again, a P4, 1.5 ghz, 512 megs of ram), but my other apps don't seem to suffer as much when things are busy. ======================================================================= Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo IM : morpheus "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Raley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 8:57 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Email Clients > > > did you move your mail to the same pst or another pst file? > I've had the problem where my pst file was about 900 megs but > once I broke it up > into multiple pst files it was fine. > > > > > Raymond Camden wrote: > > Oh yea - my inbox went from 170megs to 20megs. What I'm > talking about is > > performance in general. Outlook just seems a bit sluggish > these days. > > Mind you - I do a LOT of development work - I've got many programs > > running, but I also have 512 megs of RAM (and a P4), and it > bothers me > > that sometimes I can click on Outlook and it takes 20-30 seconds to > > display. (This is when it's already running, but in the background.) > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
