http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/the-sharia-paranoia-industry-is-very-lucrative/2011/03/04/gIQALiKIgJ_blog.html

Posted at 12:19 PM ET, 08/26/2011
The Sharia Paranoia Industry is very lucrative
By Adam Serwer
The Sharia Panic Industry is a 42 million dollar business.

That’s according to a new report from the Center for American Progress, which 
tracks the funding sources of America’s most prominent Islamophobes. Over the 
past ten years, that money has flowed from primarily from seven foundations: 
The Donors Capital Fund; the Richard Mellon Scaife Foundation, the Lynde and 
Harry Bradley Foundation, the Newton and Rochelle Becker Foundation and Newton 
and Rochelle Becker Charitable Trust; the Russell Berrie Foundation, the 
Anchorage Charitable Fund and William Rosenwald Family Fund and the Fairbrook 
Foundation.

This funding has allowed the Islamophobic right to amplify and mainstream an 
anti-Muslim message that remained on the fringe while President George W. Bush 
urged a message of tolerance. Think tanks like Frank Gaffney’s Center for 
Security policy have used the funding to produce reports promoting the myth 
that most Muslim Americans are conspiring to replace the Constitution with 
Sharia law. It’s helped people like attorney David Yerushalmi design 
anti-sharia legislation being pushed in at least 23 states, in four of which 
those the bans have actually passed. It’s helped anti-Muslim writers like 
Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, cited frequently by alleged anti-Muslim Oslo 
terrorist Anders Breivik, promote and sustain their work.

The campaign to persuade Americans that Islam is the enemy and that American 
Muslims are all potential radicals and terrorists has borne bitter fruit.

Last year a Washington Post poll found that almost half of Americans, 49 
percent, now have an unfavorable opinion towards Islam, up ten points from 2002 
and “the most negative split on the question in Post-ABC polls dating to 
October 2001.”

With the conservative media no longer held back by the need to support a 
Republican president who publicly espoused tolerance towards Islam, outlets 
like Fox News, National Review, and conservative talk radio have freely 
promoted Sharia Panic conspiracies — ones that have dovetailed neatly with 
conservative distrust for the president. Likewise, a few Republicans in 
Congress, such as Reps Peter King, Allen West, and Michele Bachmann, have used 
their authority to bolster the idea that America is at war with Islam and that 
most American Muslims are radicalized. Increasingly, religious right figures 
like Pat Robertson and John Hagee are embracing the rhetoric of Sharia Panic.

The flipside is that there’s no similarly well funded and single minded 
infrastructure opposing them. Groups like the Muslim Public Affairs Council and 
Muslim Advocates have recently tried to put forth an alternative narrative, 
pointing out that American Muslims have been key to preventing terror attacks. 
Likewise, civil liberties groups like the ACLU have debunked the idea that 
Islamic law is trumping civil law in American courts.

These efforts however, won’t succeed as long as Republican leaders continue 
to tacitly and sometimes explicitly embrace and enable those in the Sharia 
Panic Industry. Until Republican leaders try to appeal to the better angels of 
their constituents’ nature — rather than feeding on and profiting from 
their paranoia — things are unlikely to change.

By       Adam Serwer  |  12:19 PM ET, 08/26/2011

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:342026
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to