He didn't, he got it from "quite a few very long term studies". On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote:
> > How did you get "science" and "fact" from "very little positive evidence"? > > . > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > There you go trying to convince people with all that "science" and "fact" > stuff. > > > > Just isn't going to make a dent. > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Larry Lyons <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> You know there is very little positive evidence that there is any > ratiation effect, not withstanding one recent study. There has been quite a > few long term studies of cell phone use, especially in Europe. Generally > there has been little or no difference in cancer rates between heavy cell > phone users and so called light users. Neither groups have been found to be > different in terms of cancer rates compared to non cell users. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:342304 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
