What's your point? No one is arguing that over time theories cannot be improved, disproved or deprecated by new empirical evidence. So what's your point?
On 13 September 2011 10:49, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-most-famous-scientific-theories-that-turned-out-to-be-wrong.php > > ColdFusion made the list:) > > Ooops, maybe it's called a theory because it's not a fact? > > Even Stephen Hawkins recently admitted his theory about black holes is > wrong. > > I noticed even laws don't always survive: > > Newton's Laws of Motion (which were improved upon by Einstein - while > not really proved wrong, the were shown to be not quite right either. > For example in relativity or on the very small scale they don't hold). > > > http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_scientific_laws_or_theories_have_been_proven_wrong#ixzz1XqLhwR00 > > Titius–Bode law doesn't work. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:342489 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
