You are still arguing this case? After YOUR Party and YOUR Government themselves came out and said they messed up, there were no WMD, intelligence was faulty etc. etc. ? Why you still fighting this battle when it has already been lost?
Don't give a flying f*** after the fact if they found out Saddam was a threat. They can say anything, and uncover any amount of evidence NOW. The fact is 4 trillion dollars and countless lives were spent because he was a PRESENT danger at THAT TIME with WMD! It was the WMD that made him a present danger, it was the WMD that required urgent and decisive action. Trying to alter the reasoning, and the facts isn't going to make a difference to what was said back then. On 16 September 2011 10:35, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yada yada yada. > I noticed how you say it was debunked but don't provide and links. > This article is sourced from the Duelfer report and official Iraqi > documents. > If you're going to claim the Duelfer Commission Report is bullshit > please provide details. > > . > > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > I didn't see any claims in the NRO article that haven't been > > thoroughly debunked. Some people will go a really long way to keep > > claiming that Saddam was a threat in and we were therefore > > retroactively justified in going after him in spite of the fact that > > all the pre-war "intelligence" was a bag of willful lies. > > > > Sometimes, you know, the emperor really just has not clothes no matter > > how much your establishment wants to believe otherwise. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:342692 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
