Nope. Unless it was removed in markup, the language appears to mandate deep packet inspection and an access control list on outgoing traffic. In other words, your isp might be required to monitor all http requests of all users -- think of the processing requirements *there* for just a sec -- in order to block those that are considered "bad". Whether or not judicial review would be required for a site to be determined "dedicated to copyright infringement" has drawn conflicting opinions, but let me ask you this: if you were a small isp would you want to take any chance on what a random judge might consider "reasonable"? I don't think so either.
Meanwhile, the safe harbor provisions of DMCA are effectively nullified by the clause that says the website, webhost, network or whatever can be sued if it is not attempting to avoid infringement, to some undefined standard. Oh yeah, and under certain circumstances, it could become a felony to upload streaming video that infringes on copyright. It's bad, very bad, guys. It also has the weight of a helluva lotta campaign contributions on its side. Dana On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Casey Dougall - Uber Website Solutions < [email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Wanna bet forcing users through their providers DNS servers is the next > > step? > > > > All your routers belong to us! > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:345236 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
