Not just oil companies, but specifically companies that are partnered
in the Keystone XL project. Like companies who specialize in making
the pipes, or TransCanada etc. In other words he stands to make a
substantial profit because of his legislative efforts. When you stand
to make a lot of money as a result of your abuse of office, isn't that
corruption?

And why the false equivalency. Are you saying because others do it its
OK? That's a very shaky ethical stance.

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Boehner invested in Oil companies, like most Americans do. Either
> through 401ks or buying shares. This pipeline will not make the oil
> companies rich. They will always be rich, it's just another small
> project for them but a huge one for America.
>
> But tar and feather anyone with an R next to their name with baseless
> accusations and let all the real corruption with the dems get a pass.
>
> .
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> And Pelosi...well. Apparently she is the new Clinton in the "your guys did
>> it too" game. Whatever. If she was/is corrupt, that is bad, and she should
>> be prosecuted. If Boehner is corrupt, as it would seem from the little I
>> have read about this, then that is bad and he should be prosecuted.
>>
>> shrug
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:345540
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to