Your article mention Exxon, ConocoPhillips and Chevron. They are big companies.
. On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: > > Not just oil companies, but specifically companies that are partnered > in the Keystone XL project. Like companies who specialize in making > the pipes, or TransCanada etc. In other words he stands to make a > substantial profit because of his legislative efforts. When you stand > to make a lot of money as a result of your abuse of office, isn't that > corruption? > > And why the false equivalency. Are you saying because others do it its > OK? That's a very shaky ethical stance. > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Boehner invested in Oil companies, like most Americans do. Either >> through 401ks or buying shares. This pipeline will not make the oil >> companies rich. They will always be rich, it's just another small >> project for them but a huge one for America. >> >> But tar and feather anyone with an R next to their name with baseless >> accusations and let all the real corruption with the dems get a pass. >> >> . >> >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> And Pelosi...well. Apparently she is the new Clinton in the "your guys did >>> it too" game. Whatever. If she was/is corrupt, that is bad, and she should >>> be prosecuted. If Boehner is corrupt, as it would seem from the little I >>> have read about this, then that is bad and he should be prosecuted. >>> >>> shrug >> >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:345545 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
