I would agree with that statement. In the past we learned that Nukes were not the answer, and started to build weapons that would be able to hit precise targets. And not have to bomb cities with nukes, napalm and other things that cause a lot of destruction to the population.
We target the things that pose a threat. Not civilians. Sometimes we miss, it sucks and we don't want it to happen. But it does. We don't send nukes over, even though we could, it would have been much faster if we had dropped a few nukes in the mountains of Afghanistan, but we didn't do that. It is obvious by the offensive nature of some countries that if they were to acquire a nuclear weapon, they would use it. We have them, and have not used them in over 50 years. And we won't use them unless it is a last resort. > -----Original Message----- > From: N. Steven Alleyne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 12:43 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: US: invasion in the Netherlands possible > > Um... so it's OK if WE(the US) have weapons of mass destruction? Because > certainly we can be trusted not to act in our own self interest... > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
