You have a real bad attitude problem. Why do you defend with such anger a study you know nothing about? Because you think they study claims you're smarter? It doesn't. It claims nothing.
. On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: > > and actually, you're right. I am angry because you are wasting my time and > I am allowing it. Just be quiet and admit you have no idea how to evaluate > the validity of the sample, and add that you question its findings. This is > what wikipedia calls WP:IDONTLIKEIT. You are the CF equivalent. Is that not > the essence of your objection. Ok. We have all registered your displeasure. > Have a nice day. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:346932 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
