On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: > > confused. And you're still not answering my question. Where does it say > that Firth commissioned the study
Again: It turns out Firth was a guest editor on the daily BBC Radio 4 news programme Today and <LOOK HERE> COMMISSIONED neuroscientist Geraint Rees </LOOKHERE> to scan the brains of two prominent UK politicians one staunchly liberal and the other a confirmed conservative to look for differences. > or that its results were predetermined? I decided to find out what was BIOLOGICALLY WRONG with people who DON'T AGREE WITH ME and see what scientists had to say about it. - CF > What actual basis do you have for saying the study proves nothing? The study states it's all assumptions based on the findings. -- Results offer POSSIBLE accounts for cognitive styles of liberals and conservative Although these results suggest a link between political attitudes and brain structure, it is important to note that the neural processes implicated are likely to reflect complex processes of the formation of political attitudes rather than a direct representation of political opinions per se. The conceptualizing and reasoning associated with the expression of political opinions is not necessarily limited to structures or functions of the regions we identified but will require the involvement of more widespread brain regions implicated in abstract thoughts and reasoning. > /me listens to crickets. > > that's what I thought No you did not ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:346937 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
