I dismissed it because it didn't state what Larry claimed it did, the funding was totally biased and the results only work if people don't change their mind. I would have to believe half of us are conservative and the other half liberal but we can switch sides at will. If it was a legitimate study I might give it more of a chance. As for peer reviewed, I know how that process works and it's not pretty. Plus you're still reviewing what you're told by folks who appear to have an agenda.
Speaking of peer reviews, where do I find them? I could see any links to actually reviews. . On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:45 PM, PT <[email protected]> wrote: > > Besides, you cannot simply dismiss something because it does not give > you a complete answer. The study said that there are other things to > consider, but suggests that brain structure, at whatever level of > development, seems to be enough of a contributing factor that > predictions can be made within an acceptable margin of error. > Yes the study was inconclusive as far as offering concrete proof and > yes, it was suggested that more research is required, but the reason > more research is required is because the results support the hypothesis > well above random occurrence. > > Now, if the study itself is flawed, then that is one thing and the next > person to investigate can call the original experimenters on their BS, > but the results were valid enough to at least make it to peer review. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:347019 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
