I am on deadline and don't have time to play. But I know, shades of grey, quite a concept, eh?
History says that if I download this article I will find out that it doesn't mention the article Larry posted. If it does say they calculated it wrong -- and maybe that is what Larrry wants to look at -- then hey, we have science at work here and we need to see who else can repeat one or the otherl By the way, you were going to post a link about Firth paying some people off, remember? On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > If you read the stupid blog you would have realized it's based on this: > > > http://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=4MrZ9zMAAAAJ&citation_for_view=4MrZ9zMAAAAJ:u5HHmVD_uO8C > > Short link here > http://www.edvul.com/voodoocorr.php > > It's was cited a couple more times then your peer reviewed infallible > study. Because we all know that if it was peer reviewed it is perfect > and there is no arguing with it's findings. > > I'm conflicted > > . > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I detect a blog. A blog, Sam. No input validation at all, yanno? > > Bzzzt. Still SAMMYDONTLIKE IT. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:347050 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
