Well, I said he was trying to insult me with a study that I knew could be debunked without even knowing what it was, just by the description of it. She then ran with how perfect the study was and over a hundred messages later still claims anything peer reviewed is unquestionable.
So this was about an attempted insult and I was attacked on my brushing off the study backing the attack. Her typical deflection status. So it is my fault that I gave an opening but I never thought it would go this far. At this point I have to say I'm enjoying reading up about this stuff. This list might occasionally give me agida but I do learn interesting things when I'm forced to back up my opinions. I do appreciate your staying above the fray. It's refreshing. . On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:42 PM, PT <[email protected]> wrote: > > If you had simply said all of this to begin with, like this, then I > believe the discussion might have gone differently. Opening with a slam > against the study because an actor's name was tied to it, while > certainly a conversation starter, was probably not the best way to > introduce your views on the subject. :) > > I don't know of any other studies yet. I haven't looked. I haven't > cared. The results are out there in the open if anyone cares to try to > disprove the finding ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:347042 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
