Well, I said he was trying to insult me with a study that I knew could
be debunked without even knowing what it was, just by the description
of it. She then ran with how perfect the study was and over a hundred
messages later still claims anything peer reviewed is unquestionable.

So this was about an attempted insult and I was attacked on my
brushing off the study backing the attack. Her typical deflection
status.

So it is my fault that I gave an opening but I never thought it would
go this far. At this point I have to say I'm enjoying reading up about
this stuff.

This list might occasionally give me agida but I do learn interesting
things when I'm forced to back up my opinions.

I do appreciate your staying above the fray. It's refreshing.

.


On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:42 PM, PT <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> If you had simply said all of this to begin with, like this, then I
> believe the discussion might have gone differently.  Opening with a slam
> against the study because an actor's name was tied to it, while
> certainly a conversation starter, was probably not the best way to
> introduce your views on the subject.  :)
>
> I don't know of any other studies yet.  I haven't looked.  I haven't
> cared.  The results are out there in the open if anyone cares to try to
> disprove the finding

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:347042
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to