Ok. How about this? After a quick read through, it sounds to me like maybe two things.
1. They are just updating whatever was put in place after WWII and negating some things that were done in the 80's, like giving responsibilities to departments that didn't exist then, to represent the current political climate. 2. They are expecting something and planning for it. 1 sounds completely plausible. 2 sounds ... well, when was the last time you remember the government being that proactive? Maybe when people were building fallout shelters in their back yard? The section about the loans does bother me a bit. In case of emergency, the Gov will subsidize loans by private companies? err... It better just be a routine type of thing. A plan needs to be made to deal with our infrastructure. It sucks ass and is getting worse. War time/disaster production planning isn't going to mean squat when a few main junctions pop and power goes out over large portions of the east/west coast. Again. On 3/18/2012 2:01 PM, LRS Scout wrote: > > Stop derailing my thread damnit > > :) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:348722 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
