How many do you want?

http://www.cell.com/current-biology/retrieve/pii/S0960982211002892

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&term=Soc.%20Cogn.%20Affect.%20Neurosci.[ta]+AND+5[vol]+AND+349[page]&doptcmdl=Abstract

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&term=Nat.%20Neurosci.[ta]+AND+10[vol]+AND+1246[page]&doptcmdl=Abstract

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&term=Group%20Process.%20Intergroup%20Relat.[ta]+AND+13[vol]+AND+547[page]&doptcmdl=Abstract

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.20976/abstract;jsessionid=C543A0EFBE9AC3C27706554F85EA0428.d03t03?userIsAuthenticated=false&deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17470910902860308

http://scan.oxfordjournals.org/content/5/2-3/349.short

http://www.springerlink.com/content/n1v616836k016x58/

http://papers.ssrn.com/Sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1451867

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0026456

http://ann.sagepub.com/content/614/1/34.short

http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/131/2/591.short

http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v10/n10/full/nn1979.html

http://www.springerlink.com/content/n1v616836k016x58/

http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153230?journalCode=neuro

http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/367/1589/731.short

http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/367/1589/640.short

http://scan.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2011/03/18/scan.nsr009.short

There are over 1000 (actually over 2500) more articles I have yet to
go through but it looks like these results are fairly solid.

Besides you know me Tim, if I say that a set of research findings is
so, it definitely is, according to the current research and I can
usually back it up with at least a few articles.

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:06 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Sources?
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>> well not directly born republican or democratic,  but neuropsych
>> differences have been found between self identified conservatives and
>> liberals. For instance the part of the brain that mainly deals with
>> processing fear and anxiety related information tends to be larger
>> among conservatives. In contrast progressives tend to have a larger
>> and more active anterior cingulate cortex. That part of the brain
>> deals mainly with complex and nuanced data.
>>
>> That in part may explain why fear based messages resonate much more
>> with conservatives and complex and shades of grey cognition is more
>> attractive to liberals.
>>
>> Similarly another line of research with personality traits have shown
>> that liberals tend to score higher on measures of Openness to
>> Experience while conservatism is positively related to
>> Conscientiousness. Both of these traits are thought to have large
>> heritable components.
>>
>> let the frothing and teeth gnashing begin...
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 1:45 PM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Cameron Childress <[email protected]
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> Assigning fault I am fine with. My problem comes from political
>> prejudice.
>> >> To me, it's just as distasteful to say "all black people are ____" as
>> it is
>> >> to say "all republicans / democrats are ____".
>> >>
>> >
>> > Hmmm....i don't necessarily agree with you here.
>> >
>> > People are born black....people are not born democrat or republican.
>> >
>> > If you make a CHOICE, and that choice is to associate with a certain
>> > group....then i think criticism of said choice is not on it's face,
>> > distasteful. It can be, but it doesn't have to be.
>> >
>> > I would make the blanket claim that "all members of the KKK are
>> assholes",
>> > and I would stand by that. They made a choice, and here's what i think of
>> > it.
>> >
>> > I find that far less distasteful than blanket statements about people who
>> > are solely a member of a group because of genetics.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:349905
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to