thank you! that means a lot coming from you. I should add that Obama has threatened to veto this legislation if it gets to his desk in its present form, but it will not get to his desk in its present form. A whole bunch more amendments were just proposed today so it's anybody's guess what the bill currently says. Note -- none of the amendments address the "notwithstanding all other law" language apparently, and according to CNET some of them make the bill even worse.
I almost feel like chicken little saying the sky is falling this soon again after SOPA, but it really is bad stuff. If the intent is not to impinge on privacy, why retain language that says it's ok to do so? Remember all that fuss over warrantless wiretaps a few years ago? They wouldn't have to worry about warrants any more. And the stated rationale -- Chinese hackers -- would not be affected by the provisions of this bill. On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:13 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: > Good article Dana, thanks. > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> http://www.fusionauthority.com/news/4841-threat-to-fourth-amendment-surfacing-in-congress.htm >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:350245 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
