Perhaps a better analogy to use is what is happening in Syria right now. On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Eric Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > > They have a lot of firepower that we gave them back in the 80's...plus all > the stuff left behind by the soviets. IF we got a hold of captured > equipment...then yes. But that is a big huge IF...even then, we would still > be at the disadvantage because they have more. Notice the difference in > body counts between Afghans and US Military...To see a similar situation, > look at the Israeli Palestinian conflict. The casualties are so > disproportionate it should be criminal. > > > ------------------------------------ > Three Ravens Consulting > Eric Roberts > Owner/Developer > [email protected] > tel: 630-486-5255 > fax: 630-310-8531 > http://www.threeravensconsulting.com > ------------------------------------ > > -----Original Message----- > From: LRS Scout [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 8:12 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: Shooting at Empire State building.People under stress or > something? > > > Yeah, cause the Afghans haven't done more with less right? > > The big things you would need, Anti-Aircraft and Anti-Armor weapons would > bcaptured, and brought over by deserting troops. > > I went to 2C school, was a javelin gunner, do you have any idea what I can > do with that weapons system? > > Even rotary wing aircraft can't do anything about, and I can kill any armor > on the battle field out to 2K. > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Eric Roberts < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Yeah...when the government has stealth aircraft, drones, and >> missiles...you little handgun...or even assault rifle, isn't going amount > to much. >> >> ------------------------------------ >> Three Ravens Consulting >> Eric Roberts >> Owner/Developer >> [email protected] >> tel: 630-486-5255 >> fax: 630-310-8531 >> http://www.threeravensconsulting.com >> ------------------------------------ >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Maureen [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 2:00 PM >> To: cf-community >> Subject: Re: Shooting at Empire State building.People under stress or >> something? >> >> >> Not quite. The right to bear arms is to protect the citizens from >> government. A simple read of British history in the years immediately >> preceding the enactment of the Bill of Rights will show why. >> >> But as you say, with the current level of lethal technology possessed >> by the government, simply having guns is not sufficient deterrent >> against a government intent on taking away our rights. >> >> In some ways, the focus on the 2nd amendment right to bear arms draws >> attention from the real government encroachments such as the Patriot >> Act and the War on (some) Drugs. >> >> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Jerry Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> > The right to bear arms is because that's the last form of defense >> > against tyranny. Not to hunt. It's to protect yourself from the >> > police. - Ice T >> > >> > Ice T gets it. >> > >> >> >> >> > > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:354129 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
