So no murders, no genocide, no proof he financed FARC, only a lot of accusations from the opposition. Gee, let's label him a dictator and put him in the same bucket with the monsters, because that's what we do to those with whom we disagree.
I distinctly remember the first time I heard a newscaster label Chavez negatively. It was shortly after he had offered cheap or free gas to the US after Katrina. My immediate thought was "ah, the new bogeyman". On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 3:17 AM, Jerry Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: > > " Seriously? What has Chavez done to be included with that group? He > seemed rather benign until he called Bush a devil and promptly because a > victim of a massive smear campaign. " > > Benign? > > The following are just complaints to the International Criminal Court. > Granted, they are only complaints. > > Well, he hasn't set up any death camps that we know of. Of course we > didn't find out about Hitler, Stalin, and Mao's death machines until after > the fact. > > > So, as a dictator, he might not be in a class with the big three, but I > don't think he can be called benign (unless you're an overpaid Hollywood > star looking to get some creds with the left). > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:354241 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
