Is the point he was making invalid? Can you address that? That the sheer number of hulls shouldn't be the measurement of the Navy's capabilities?
I thought this infographic that passed through twitter was interesting: http://i.imgur.com/6NgA8.gif On a more humorous note: http://twitter.yfrog.com/esxtzttj Jerry Milo Johnson On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Bruce Sorge <[email protected]> wrote: > > And I got the impression he was a condescending asshole that at that moment > did not appear very presidential at all. Oh, and the army still has bayonets > by the way. We still use them to this day. > > Sent from my iPhone 4S. > > On Oct 23, 2012, at 11:22 AM, "Larry C. Lyons" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Have to admit Obama did a good slapdown. So good I have to quote it: >> >> "You mention the Navy, for example, and that we have fewer ships than >> we did in 1916. Well governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets, >> ... We have these things called aircraft carriers and planes land on >> them. We have these ships that go underwater, nuclear submarines." >> >> >> Not only did he take Romney to task, but made him out to be a >> blithering idiot to boot. >> >> Pity there isn't a fourth debate. >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:356361 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
