With all the issues going on in Florida and Ohio, I think those states are not going to get counted for weeks. Both of the state's Secretary of State have been doing some really underhanded shit.
------------------------------------ Three Ravens Consulting Eric Roberts Owner/Developer [email protected] tel: 630-486-5255 fax: 630-310-8531 http://www.threeravensconsulting.com ------------------------------------ -----Original Message----- From: GMoney [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 3:57 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: it's over I read somewhere today that it could be weeks until swing states, particularly ohio, certify their counts. This is gonna suck..... On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote: > > err..tomorrow night. I'll probably also get hammered tomorrow night. > If you know what I mean. > > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > If you notice, the image says "16% in" albeit faintly. They are > > obviously running tests of the system that is going to get hammered tonight. > Somehow > > those tests ended up public. Oops. Probably happened to those of us > > here before, however. > > > > As for polling and analysis, I like FiveThirtyEight. Nate Silver > > does statistics very very well. > > > > http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/ > > > > Cheers, > > Judah > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:42 PM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> That's pretty messed up. Bush had 500,000 K more popular votes, but > >> if this map is to be believed, Romney will get almost 4, 000,000 > >> more popular votes, and yet lose...that seems unbelievable. > >> > >> Also, this shows about 36,000,000 Americans casting a vote for > >> President.....is that accurate??? I knew our voting numbers sucked > >> as a democracy, but out of 300,000,000 of us, only 36 million are > >> going to vote??????? REALLY? > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Casey Dougall - Uber Website > >> Solutions < [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/11/early-election-results-via > -msnbc-148500.html > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > I like how this pans out... Maybe will go back to popular vote > >> > and > >> squash > >> > these swing state campaigns and all the stupid news that goes > >> > along > >> with it > >> > once and for all... > >> > > >> > For the record... > >> > > >> > Democrats have won the popular vote in four out of the last five > >> > presidential elections - including the 2000 race in which Al Gore > >> > got > >> > 500,000 more votes than George W. Bush nationally but wound up > >> > losing > >> the > >> > electoral vote by two votes. (Worth noting: The last time one > >> > party > had > >> > such a long run of popular vote victories was when Republicans > >> > won the popular vote in five of the six presidential elections > >> > between 1968 > and > >> > 1992.) > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:357612 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
