Word!!

On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Cameron Childress <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > Cam, the world you describe is one that is presented in some high school
> > economics texts, I suppose, but not really anywhere beyond that.
> >
>
> This is not a valid classification.
>
>
> > Rule number one of actual economics is that there is no truly free
> market.
> >
>
> It's not rule number one, but no - there is no truly free market, only
> varied degrees of it, just like everything else in life.
>
>
> > The prerequirements of a free market includes absolute, instantaneous,
> > knowledge amongst all parties, it requires symmetry between actors and it
> > requires perfectly rational actors.
>
>
> This is not a requirement for a free market, it is a requirement for a
> perfect free market actor.
>
>
> > The closest we get to it in practice is probably the commodities market.
>
>
> Closest actors, this doesn't mean a system requires perfect actors to
> function effectively.
>
>
> > The further we get away from that, the more we have to deal with actual
> > real entities and their complications. When you get to the level of
> > employment, you are deep down in the weeds where actors aren't rational,
> > differentiation between consumer and supplier is multifaceted and there
> is
> > substantial inequality of knowledge, which is itself asymmetric.
> >
>
> Nope, people aren't rational. They buy big screen TVs with their tax refund
> and then can't put food on the table the next day. Very irrational, crazy
> actors.  But there is no law prohibiting that wacky silly, self-destructive
> behavior - nor should there be.
>
> These same irrational actors could potentially cancel their union
> memberships, shoot themselves in the foot. Maybe they are smart actors,
> maybe they are dumb actors, rational.irrational.... A Free(er) Market will
> sort all that out.
>
>
> > It is nothing close to a free market and it never will be. The
> requirements
> > for the simplistic model just cannot be met.
> >
>
> I disagree. If the only acceptable for my Free Market is in it's purest
> textbook form, you are correct. But this is not the only option. There are
> many principles that can be applied to all parts of our lives that are Free
> Market principles and the results are quite valid and predictable.
>
>
> > The systems do, however, require constraints to protect the actors (on
> > both sides) and to help the systems toward optimization.
> >
>
> I think this is the most fundamental difference in our opinions on this
> matter. I favor letting idiots be idiots. Take the warning labels off. Stop
> "protecting" the poor poor irrational people from their own stupidity and
> allow them to fail. This is how people learn to act differently and that is
> a much better lesson (in my opinion) than "well, I don't know why but
> that's just the way it is because the government makes us do it that way".
>
>
> > We're still trying to figure out the best way to deal with all those
> > things. It isn't obvious because it is a complex issue and an evolving
> > system. Society is including moral valuations (freedom, dignity,
> > fulfillment, etc) as variables in the equations that just don't arise in
> > systems like commodities. And at the end of the day, people aren't
> > commodities. Corn doesn't make choices.
>
>
> Fundamental flaw here: The Corn is not the employee, it's the job.
>
> The job is the commodity, not the employee. The employee is only the
> commodity in a world where a Union (or Government) is controlling (trading)
> people.
>
> -Cameron
>
> ...
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:359064
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to