"There's a difference in motivation though. McVeigh was motivated totally out
of his ideology...he acted BECAUSE he was a right wing nut."

That's debatable.  Here are two not so right wing excerpts from his
writings:

The administration has said that Iraq has no right to stockpile chemical or
biological weapons (“weapons of mass destruction”) — mainly because they
have used them in the past.

Well, if that’s the standard by which these matters are decided, then the
U.S. is the nation that set the precedent. The U.S. has stockpiled these
same weapons (and more) for over 40 years. The U.S. claims this was done
for deterrent purposes during its “Cold War” with the Soviet Union. Why,
then, it is invalid for Iraq to claim the same reason (deterrence) with
respect to Iraq’s (real) war with, and the continued threat of, its
neighbor Iran?

The administration claims that Iraq has used these weapons in the past.
We’ve all seen the pictures that show a Kurdish woman and child frozen in
death from the use of chemical weapons. But, have you ever seen those
pictures juxtaposed next to pictures from Hiroshima or Nagasaki?

I suggest that one study the histories of World War I, World War II and
other “regional conflicts” that the U.S. has been involved in to
familiarize themselves with the use of “weapons of mass destruction.”

Remember Dresden? How about Hanoi? Tripoli? Baghdad? What about the big
ones — Hiroshima and Nagasaki? (At these two locations, the U.S. killed at
least 150,000 non-combatants — mostly women and children — in the blink of
an eye. Thousands more took hours, days, weeks or months to die).

If Saddam is such a demon, and people are calling for war crimes charges
and trials against him and his nation, why do we not hear the same cry for
blood directed at those responsible for even greater amounts of “mass
destruction” — like those responsible and involved in dropping bombs on the
cities mentioned above?
The truth is, the U.S. has set the standard when it comes to the
stockpiling and use of weapons of mass destruction.


and


Hypocrisy when it comes to the death of children? In Oklahoma City, it was
family convenience that explained the presence of a day-care center placed
between street level and the law enforcement agencies which occupied the
upper floors of the building. Yet, when discussion shifts to Iraq, any
day-care center in a government building instantly becomes “a shield.”
Think about it.

(Actually, there is a difference here. The administration has admitted to
knowledge of the presence of children in or near Iraqi government
buildings, yet they still proceed with their plans to bomb —saying that
they cannot be held responsible if children die. There is no such proof,
however, that knowledge of the presence of children existed in relation to
the Oklahoma City bombing.)

When considering morality and “mens rea” [criminal intent], in light of
these facts, I ask: Who are the true barbarians? ...

I find it ironic, to say the least, that one of the aircraft used to drop
such a bomb on Iraq is dubbed “The Spirit of Oklahoma.” This leads me to a
final, and unspoken, moral hypocrisy regarding the use of weapons of mass
destruction.

When a U.S. plane or cruise missile is used to bring destruction to a
foreign people, this nation rewards the bombers with applause and praise.
What a convenient way to absolve these killers of any responsibility for
the destruction they leave in their wake.

Unfortunately, the morality of killing is not so superficial. The truth is,
the use of a truck, a plane or a missile for the delivery of a weapon of
mass destruction does not alter the nature of the act itself.

These are weapons of mass destruction — and the method of delivery matters
little to those on the receiving end of such weapons.
Whether you wish to admit it or not, when you approve, morally, of the
bombing of foreign targets by the U.S. military, you are approving of acts
morally equivalent to the bombing in Oklahoma City ...


His bombing was reminiscent of Obama mentor Bill Ayer's Weather Underground
campaign of bombings in the 60's and 70's as well.

J

-

Ninety percent of politicians give the other ten percent a bad reputation.
- Henry Kissinger

Politicians are people who, when they see light at the end of the tunnel,
go out and buy some mor

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:360897
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to