Did you just say if you make a claim enough times it becomes a fact? That's not science at all.
http://www.quadrant.org.au/blogs/doomed-planet/2013/01/of-climate-science-and-stomach-bugs . On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: > > At times its real sad the way some deny reality. One of the hallmarks > of whether something is factual is the weight of published research > that supports the theory. On sheer numbers along there has been 13.950 > articles published in scientific journals that have looked at climate > change. As the author James Powell notes: "24 of the 13,950 articles, > 0.17% or 1 in 581, clearly reject global warming or endorse a cause > other than CO2 emissions for observed warming. (http://s.tt/1tBXZ). > > I think that only Evolution and the Theory of Gravity have more > empirical support. And I head that a fundy group has launched a new > theory about that as well, its called Intelligent Falling. > http://www.theonion.com/articles/evangelical-scientists-refute-gravity-with-new-int,1778/ > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:360906 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
