Evidence for God.

As Carl Sagan said, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

For that matter I have seen no ordinary evidence that supports the
existence of a deity.

What is it. And have alternative explanations been advanced and dismissed?

The thing is that its very much like Bertram Russel's teapot orbiting
a remote star, or the Invisible Pink Flying Unicorn.


On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 2:57 PM, William Bowen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Jerry Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> "No evidence would require "faith." Lack of evidence for the existence of
>> god logically leads to the conclusion god does not exist. Find some
>> evidence."
>>
>> Who said there is no evidence for God?
>
> There is? Where?
>
>> "Your supposition is that atheists should be required to prove a negative?"
>>
>> I am not asking anyone to prove anything.  Atheist don't have to prove
>> squat.  They can be just like the Europeans who did not believe black swans
>> existed.
>
>
>> "Only because it makes the religious feel better to do so."
>>
>> Or maybe because it does fit since it is faith based.
>
> You don't need "faith" to be atheist, the mountainous *lack* of
> evidence supporting the existence of "god" is reason enough.
>
>
> --
> will
>
> "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
> and that would just be unacceptable."
> - Carrie Fisher
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:361015
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to