then again, the person is in public. By no means is driving a car can be considered a private act. So why is a warrant warranted?
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Where are the liberals? I thought this was an ACLU case? Aren't they > the very definition of liberal, or does that only apply when they > bring a case involving religion or guns? > > I find the very thought of warrantless searches of any kind very > scary. I also know that regardless of how the supreme court rules, > the government will do those searches anyhow. They know it is easier > in cases like this to ask for forgiveness after the fact than for > permission before the fact. > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Jerry Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Why is this even debatable? How was the Supreme Court decision a 5-4 >> decision instead of 9-0? Where are all of the "liberals" who were so >> enraged at Bush's assault on freedom? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:362026 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
