So not only are they religious nut jobs, but they continue to support anachronistic and detrimental laws that were abolished centuries ago lol :-P
To see how one would select a State/ Country religion, just look at Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran etc. I believe state religion etc. is codified in their laws. And I'm not intolerant of religion, particularly Christianity...but it's drawn my ire. Do you think there could be other reasons that people would find this move appalling? On 3 April 2013 22:54, Jerry Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: > > "The party consistently appears to be led by extremist religious nuts." > > That's just a sample of state/religion relationships that were in effect > after the Constitution. Some persisted into the 1900's. This Bill looks > like something from then. > > I agree with Hatton though. It will not come close to being law, but it > will get publicity and draw the ire of the those who are intolerant of > religion, particularly Christianity. > > > J > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:362361 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
