Cause they're executing rape victims in soccer stadiums right? How about a sense of scope people? On Apr 3, 2013 11:11 PM, "Vivec" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > So not only are they religious nut jobs, but they continue to support > anachronistic and detrimental laws that were abolished centuries ago lol > :-P > > To see how one would select a State/ Country religion, just look at > Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran etc. > I believe state religion etc. is codified in their laws. > > And I'm not intolerant of religion, particularly Christianity...but it's > drawn my ire. > > Do you think there could be other reasons that people would find this move > appalling? > > On 3 April 2013 22:54, Jerry Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > "The party consistently appears to be led by extremist religious nuts." > > > > That's just a sample of state/religion relationships that were in effect > > after the Constitution. Some persisted into the 1900's. This Bill looks > > like something from then. > > > > I agree with Hatton though. It will not come close to being law, but it > > will get publicity and draw the ire of the those who are intolerant of > > religion, particularly Christianity. > > > > > > J > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:362362 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
