I had originally thought to reply with something similar Maureen, but then I 
decided it wouldn't make a difference to Sam or Jerry.


On Apr 4, 2013, at 10:13 PM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> The Economist and Politico present the opinions of journalists, not
> scientists, so their view are worthless in determining any form of science,
> settled or otherwise.
> 
> Also, that article is not commenting on science, but on yet another
> journalist's opinion.
> 
> Opinions <> Facts
> 
> 
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> When you lose Politico and The Economist I think you're done.
>> 
>> 
>> http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/04/04/the_end_of_an_illusion_117795.html
>> 
>> Does anyone still think it's :settled science"?
>> 
> 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:362437
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to