They weren't basing it on today's weather, but on the last twenty years worth of data. Everything you were told about global warming ended up being wrong so someone's got some splaining to do.
. On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Cameron Childress <[email protected]>wrote: > > I stopped reading after I realized it was another article using a > ridiculously short dataset to "debunk" an issue that's been long > established as having a much longer timeframe. > > I'm willing to accept that we haven't figured everything out yet about > human impact on the climate, but anyone claiming that the weather outside > RIGHT NOW is proof of anything has zero credibility, effective immediately. > > -Cameron > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Maureen wrote: > > > Yeah, I know. But sometimes I just can't let the comments go > > unchallenged. It might not influence them, but there are others whose > > mind might still be somewhat open. > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Marlon Moyer <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > I had originally thought to reply with something similar Maureen, but > > then I decided it wouldn't make a difference to Sam or Jerry. > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:362442 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
