Of course not. Only 6% of all scientists in the US are republicans. BTW that's down from over 50% just 30 years ago.
Given the republican policies on science it makes perfect sense why support a party that is completely hostile to you and your profession. On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Marlon Moyer <[email protected]>wrote: > > I had originally thought to reply with something similar Maureen, but then > I decided it wouldn't make a difference to Sam or Jerry. > > > On Apr 4, 2013, at 10:13 PM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The Economist and Politico present the opinions of journalists, not > > scientists, so their view are worthless in determining any form of > science, > > settled or otherwise. > > > > Also, that article is not commenting on science, but on yet another > > journalist's opinion. > > > > Opinions <> Facts > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> When you lose Politico and The Economist I think you're done. > >> > >> > >> > http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/04/04/the_end_of_an_illusion_117795.html > >> > >> Does anyone still think it's :settled science"? > >> > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:362451 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
