"The convincing proof you have is based on lies. The models were all wrong, the hockey stick graph was faked and they admit there is no science to back up the claim warming is caused by man or that there is even warming anymore."
At this point, it takes more faith to believe in man made global warming than it does to believe in God. That is why it is called the Cult of Man Made Global Warming. I feel that many of the cult members have realized the truth, but they cannot bring themselves to admit they were wrong. They would continue to espouse a lie instead of losing face. J - Ninety percent of politicians give the other ten percent a bad reputation. - Henry Kissinger Politicians are people who, when they see light at the end of the tunnel, go out and buy some more tunnel. - John Quinton On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > Because the folks that wrote the report that you believe as of AGC admitted > they were wrong. The IPCC is a political document not a scientific document > and it's flawed. The convincing proof you have is based on lies. The models > were all wrong, the hockey stick graph was faked and they admit there is no > science to back up the claim warming is caused by man or that there is even > warming anymore. > > Even your consensus list is likely from 2009 before the emails exposed the > massive fraud. > > . > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:52 AM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I did not arrive at a scientific consensus, the scientific community > > arrived at that consensus. I arrived at the decision to agree with their > > conclusions. > > > > I read a few of the studies, read some of the journal articles written by > > those who conducted the studies, listened to speeches by scientists and > > scientific organizations, and accepted that their science was sound and > > their conclusions were worth accepting as our best possible knowledge of > > the situation as it stands today. > > > > How did you arrive at your conclusion that the science is wrong? > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > If you don't think your part of a Al Gores religion than just prove it. > > > Show me how you arrived at a scientific consensus that man causes > global > > > warming. > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:00 AM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Yes it is. > > > > > > > > I don't really care that Sam (or anyone else not in a position to > > affect > > > > policy) wants to hold an opinion that is contrary to current > scientific > > > > findings. They have that right, and they can surely argue their > > position. > > > > Science has been wrong. > > > > > > > > But I object to being labeled a "believer in a religion". I won't > stand > > > for > > > > that. I believe in science, and anyone who as part of their argument > > says > > > > otherwise, is not doing so honestly...and that I do take exception > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Larry C. Lyons < > [email protected] > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that is the essence of science. Provide multiple reliable and > > > > demonstrable > > > > > data across different studies that contradict the theory then the > > > theory > > > > is > > > > > rejected. 13926 studies plus is a lot of studies to overcome. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:362677 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
