Take your time .
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > Larry, I think the last guy slapped you too hard. > > Answer the question you keep avoiding: How many of those so called > studies, since many of them are news stories, support AGC > > > To argue woth a person who has renounced the use of reason is like > administering medicine to the dead - Thomas Paine > > . > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> 13926 studies in peer reviewed scientific journals vs 24. That's rather >> conclusive. >> >> As I've said before to you Sam if you've been slapped in the face 10 >> different ways, its a pretty good guess that you've been slapped. >> >> Let me put it this way: In this case you've been slapped in the face 13926 >> times. >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> > How can you believe in Science? Its a methodology, a technique, a way of >> > thinking. It is despite of not because of belief. >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:00 AM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> Yes it is. >> >> >> >> I don't really care that Sam (or anyone else not in a position to >> affect >> >> policy) wants to hold an opinion that is contrary to current scientific >> >> findings. They have that right, and they can surely argue their >> position. >> >> Science has been wrong. >> >> >> >> But I object to being labeled a "believer in a religion". I won't stand >> >> for >> >> that. I believe in science, and anyone who as part of their argument >> says >> >> otherwise, is not doing so honestly...and that I do take exception too. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected] >> >> >wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> >> > that is the essence of science. Provide multiple reliable and >> >> demonstrable >> >> > data across different studies that contradict the theory then the >> >> theory is >> >> > rejected. 13926 studies plus is a lot of studies to overcome. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:55 PM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > Cam and I have sided with the scientific consensus, as we >> understand >> >> it. >> >> > > Larry has no bearing on our feelings re: Global Warming. >> >> > > >> >> > > Present us proof that our understanding of the current scientific >> >> > consensus >> >> > > is wrong, and we'll happily and humbly agree with you. >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Cameron Childress < >> >> [email protected] >> >> > > >wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Yawn. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Sam <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > > > >> >> > > > > Why Cam? Did I hurt your feelings pointing out how silly you've >> >> been >> >> > > all >> >> > > > > these years backing Al Gore and Larry's flawed theories? >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > When you side with Larry as often as you do you really need to >> do >> >> > some >> >> > > > > self evaluation of who the troll is before labeling others. >> >> > > > > You really have moved to extreme left in the last few months. >> >> Troll >> >> > > > > territory I would say. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:362684 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
