I do, indeed, find speech more important (and powerful) than firearms. I happen to like both.
My comment, however, was not that the 2nd amendment is not important but rather on the financial backing of groups around the 2nd versus the 4th. Your reaction to that is notable. Judah On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:43 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: > > You find speech to be more important than firearms? > > Wiyh firearms they can't stop speech.... > On Apr 12, 2013 1:40 PM, "Jerry Milo Johnson" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > It definitely sucks. > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > The Fourth Amendment does not protect communications held in > electronic > > > storage, such as email messages stored on a server, because internet > > users > > > do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in such > communications. > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.slashgear.com/irs-believes-it-can-read-your-emails-chats-and-more-without-a-warrant-10277338/ > > > > > > Lot's of corporate money backing the NRA's fight on the 2nd amendment. > > Not > > > so much backing the ACLU's fight for the 4th. > > > > > > Judah > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:362696 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
