That's cute. 500 groups delayed for over three years but not outright
denied.
Good one.

.



On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> One thing may of us seem to forget is that how many of these groups were
> denied tax exempt status as a social welfare and education group? In fact,
> the only known 501(c)(4) applicant to have its status denied happens to be
> a progressive group: the Maine chapter of Emerge America, which trains
> Democratic women to run for office. (
>
> http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/meet_the_group_the_irs_actually_revoked_democrats/
> )
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> >
> > I personally think this IRS issue is less political than it is petty
> > us-vs-them.
> >
> > I think it is pretty obvious that any "class" of non-profits, which had
> as
> > a class recently skirted the line of political speech allowed by
> > non-profits, and whose main reason for existing is to reduce the size of
> > government, and specifically wanting to abolish the IRS, is going to come
> > under greater scrutiny by IRS bureaucrats who police those rules.
> >
> > Shouldnt happen, but thinking it wouldnt is not admitting the human
> factor.
> >
> > The groups that were set aside to receive extra scrutiny were
> specifically
> > targeting the IRS. Seems pretty clean to me.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:57 PM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > It does if one of the parties is trying to make it out to be a
> political
> > > issue...
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I am not sure it matters what the political affiliation is of the
> > person
> > > > who 'ordered' it. Targeting a specific group because of political
> > reasons
> > > > is wrong.
> > > >
> > > > End. Of. Story.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Jerry Barnes <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The establishment Republican party is no fan of the tea party
> > movement.
> > > > >
> > > > > It wouldn't be surprising in the least if there were Republicans
> > > involved
> > > > > in targeting tea party groups for "special" consideration.
> > > > >
> > > > > Consider former GOP senator Trent Lott:
> > > > >
> > > > > We don’t need a lot of Jim DeMint disciples. As soon as they get
> > here,
> > > we
> > > > > need to co-opt them. - Trent Lott
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > J
> > > > >
> > > > > -
> > > > >
> > > > > Some of my best memories are sitting on my dad’s lap, cheering on
> > Olga
> > > > and
> > > > > Nadia, Carl Lewis, and others for their brilliance and perfection.
> -
> > > > > Michelle Obama about the 1984 Olympics when she was 20 years old.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:364453
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to