http://mediatrackers.org/florida/2013/01/16/climate-alarmist-michael-mann-charges-10000-speaker-fee
. On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]>wrote: > > so a right wing blog hit piece is supposed to be proof? Even if it is the > case, which I completely dispute, I can also show that all the other > climate scientists who are not on the corporate teat? Like Mann who has > been harassed by republican AG of Virginia Cuccininelli simply because Mann > has the wrong ideology. > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/11/18/dr-james-hansens-growing-financial-scandal-now-over-a-million-dollars-of-outside-income/ > > > > . > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > nice myth. Did he make millions? You make an extraordinary claim there > > but > > > have no demonstrable proof - s how do we know you're not just making it > > up. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > How many $millions did Jim Hanson make on his speaking tour while > > working > > > > at NASA? How much is he making now that he quit? What about Al Gore > > with > > > > his expensive caps? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/05/19/the-well-funded-climate-business-follow-the-money/ > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Larry C. Lyons < > [email protected] > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Really stupid. a scam? > > > > > > > > > > What makes more sense, > > > > > > > > > > Small groups that barely have enough money to pay their workers > > > salaries, > > > > > are pooling their money in a massive conspiracy with all but a few > of > > > the > > > > > climate scientists to kill the world's economy. > > > > > > > > > > Or > > > > > > > > > > Large Energy and dirty industrial companies are spending a small > > > portion > > > > of > > > > > their massive profits, to bribe or coopt whomever they can to > protect > > > > their > > > > > profits and limit any future liability. > > > > > > > > > > http://www.lyonsmorris.com/test/which_makes_more_sense.png > > > > > > > > > > You see how utterly stupid your position is here Sam. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you series or are you helping me make my point that this is a > > > scam? > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Vivec <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Long story short, nothing about the pause changes the basic > > > nature > > > > of > > > > > > the > > > > > > > climate problem. We are still on a course for up to 6 degrees > > > Celsius > > > > > > > warming <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/sci/tech/8364926.stm>, > which > > > > will > > > > > > lead > > > > > > > to multiple simultaneous humanitarian > > > > > > > disasters<http://natgeotv.com/ca/six_degrees/about>. > > > > > > > Climate scientists, unlike conservative pundits, are still > > > extremely > > > > > > > worried< > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/climate-science-tells-us-the-alarm-bells-are-ringing/2013/06/07/ca81cb84-cef6-11e2-8845-d970ccb04497_story.html > > > > > > > >. > > > > > > > Agencies like the International Energy > > > > > > > Agency< > > http://www.rtcc.org/iea-world-heading-for-3-6c-of-warming/> > > > > and > > > > > > > the World Bank< > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/06/17862361/turn-down-heat-climate-extremes-regional-impacts-case-resilience-full-report > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > panicking, running around waving their arms with their hair on > > > fire. > > > > > Its > > > > > > > all as dire as ever. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lol. Yes, places are still going to be fricking covered by the > > > ocean. > > > > > The > > > > > > > sea level has already risen, or are the GOP going to argue > > against > > > > that > > > > > > as > > > > > > > well? ;-D > > > > > > > I think the article is spot on regarding the crazies that we > see > > in > > > > the > > > > > > > media from the republicans. At least at some level they know > that > > > > those > > > > > > > positions embarrass the rest of the party. > > > > > > > It would seem, however, that those in charge of the party , if > > they > > > > do > > > > > > not > > > > > > > also share these crazy notions, believe that the "crazy" base > > > > > outnumbers > > > > > > or > > > > > > > outvotes the moderate Republicans. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I still think that party is responsible for the lack of > > leadership > > > we > > > > > see > > > > > > > from the US on climate change > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365164 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
