That has nothing to do with the VA Tim...stay focused...

-----Original Message-----
From: LRS Scout [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 2:15 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: DUI Checkpoint Refusal


Won't and can't aren't the same thing.

They can and are doing what ever they want now regardless of the
constitution, common law precedence, or existing legislation and regulation.

Again Obama has doubled down on Bush's policies and its hurt you personally
and you continue to argue semantics and ignore tyranny.
On Jul 8, 2013 2:59 PM, "Eric Roberts" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
> The VA Cop is a civilian cop...not the military.  If you are rated 
> with a disability, that precludes you from being called back to 
> service...even if you were technically still in the IRR.  So no...you 
> won't ever be called back into service.  Neither will I.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LRS Scout [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 1:33 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: RE: DUI Checkpoint Refusal
>
>
> I'm just telling you how it is being enforced man
>
> I was certainly just walked around by a va cop with a gun. And 
> honestly under the militia act you and I fight over and various recall 
> laws and executive orders you and I could even potentially be called 
> back to active service. You know this. Stop loss happened, no pay 
> happened. Dudes were called back for Iraq, old dudes.
>
> You took great delight in pointing out my pie in the sky idealism vs 
> the practical implementation of the law.
>
> You have a squeegasm everyone time some republican says or does 
> something slightly out of line but your response given related 
> evidence of felonious behavior, even murder most foul, conducted by 
> your man is to simply brush it all off. Even as you are personally 
> sunk deeper into multigenerational debt, chains of less liberty more 
> oversight less representation more taxes and further abuses, you deny 
> the evidence before you.
>
> I thought you were occupy Chicago Eric?
>
> Where's your revolution man?
> On Jul 8, 2013 2:21 PM, "Eric Roberts" 
> <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > 802(a)( (5) Retired members of a reserve component who are receiving 
> > hospitalization from an armed force.
> >
> > VA is not an armed force
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: LRS Scout [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 12:10 PM
> > To: cf-community
> > Subject: RE: DUI Checkpoint Refusal
> >
> >
> > I just did
> >
> > Retired from active component or retired from reserve component 
> > seeking treatment
> >
> > 4 & 5
> > On Jul 8, 2013 1:08 PM, "Eric Roberts"
> > <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Show me the regs that say you are governed by UCMJ...
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: LRS Scout [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 12:01 PM
> > > To: cf-community
> > > Subject: RE: DUI Checkpoint Refusal
> > >
> > >
> > > That's what I found quickly
> > >
> > > The 30% came from my field examiner.
> > >
> > > You think I wanted to take my blog down or i just "agreed" to? Its 
> > > coming back though. F it They agreed to do stuff I agreed to take 
> > > it
> > down.
> > I did
> > > what I said.   Enough.   I'm literally bleeding out of my ass and
> covered
> > > in yellow sores that are probably mrsa again. I was just turned 
> > > away at the clinic and threatened with arrest for cursing on the 
> > > way to the door. We have no va hospital here.
> > >
> > > Why can the fbi have my records without a warrant?   Because I use the
> > va.
> > > Why can they take my stuff? Because I'm a vet and retired at 100%.
> > > But only unemployable not even full 100% so nothing like medical 
> > > for my kids or anything.
> > >
> > > Screw them and screw you man. You off all people should know better.
> > > The vets are just the easiest to impact because we already signed 
> > > away our rights
> > >
> > > What's gonna happen under Obama care? Who are later 
> > > administrations going to target with applications like prism? Who 
> > > is already in custody under the terms of the ndaa?
> > >
> > > Why are you all asleep at the wheel?
> > >
> > > Stop letting them kill the republic.
> > >
> > > Will you wake up when I'm dead in the gutter? Either from 
> > > something treatable or a cops bullet?
> > >
> > > Or for speech.
> > >  On Jul 8, 2013 12:40 PM, "Eric Roberts"
> > > <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Please show me the regs that say that Tim...until then, I am 
> > > > going to say you are full of it...
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: LRS Scout [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 11:17 AM
> > > > To: cf-community
> > > > Subject: RE: DUI Checkpoint Refusal
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You need to look into that
> > > >
> > > > If you get compensation or pension above 30% You're still 
> > > > property
> > > >
> > > > How do you think the va justifies all the shit they do?
> > > > On Jul 8, 2013 12:13 PM, "Eric Roberts"
> > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Umm...no...you are not ruled by the UCMJ to get money from the
> VA...
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: LRS Scout [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 10:58 AM
> > > > > To: cf-community
> > > > > Subject: Re: DUI Checkpoint Refusal
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It is I'm many places and in the UCMJ which I still have to 
> > > > > live by because I get va monies On Jul 8, 2013 11:54 AM, "Scott
Stroz"
> > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Adultery is a violation of honor and a social contract, 
> > > > > > should that be a crime, too?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:38 AM, LRS Scout 
> > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Its a violation of honor and the social contract.
> > > > > > > On Jul 8, 2013 11:29 AM, "Scott Stroz" <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > How are you the 'victim'. If I simply stand in your 
> > > > > > > > driveway and do not impede you in any way. In what way 
> > > > > > > > are you a
> > 'victim'?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So everyone should be able to drive how ever fast they 
> > > > > > > > want, where they want, whenever they want? Even in a 
> > > > > > > > school zone when school is letting
> > > > > > > out?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Passing a stopped school bus with flashing red lights is 
> > > > > > > > OK with you so long as no one gets harmed?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > At least you are consistent, I will give you that.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Why should perjury be a crime, but not the others? If I 
> > > > > > > > lie under oath,
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > no one is harmed as a result, who is the victim?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:23 AM, LRS Scout 
> > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm the victim if you enter my land. My rights have 
> > > > > > > > > been
> > > > infringed.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Medical? If it's fraud and you're saying you're 
> > > > > > > > > something you're not
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > should be a crime. The assaults we're seeing on 
> > > > > > > > > alternative medicine
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > medical care are wrong. My body is my own and I should 
> > > > > > > > > be able to do
> > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > it as I see fit.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I don't think we should have speed limits.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I think there should be warning lights but not crimes.
> > > > > > > > > Why should I
> > > > > > sit
> > > > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > > a red at 2am with no one in sight?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > All of those but perjury shouldn't be crimes, unless 
> > > > > > > > > and until
> > > > > > > negligence
> > > > > > > > > occurs.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Lying under oath should be a crime. Take the fifth but 
> > > > > > > > > don't lie
> > > > > > under
> > > > > > > > > oath.
> > > > > > > > > On Jul 8, 2013 11:12 AM, "Scott Stroz"
> > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > So, 'entering your land' is a crime - albeit 
> > > > > > > > > > 'victim-less', but
> > > > > > > driving
> > > > > > > > > > while intoxicated is not?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > If I practiced medicine without a license and only 
> > > > > > > > > > helped people
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > > one person was harmed in any way, is that a crime?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Here are a few other 'victimless crimes' that should 
> > > > > > > > > > only be
> > > > > > > prosecuted
> > > > > > > > > > when/if an accident/harm occurs as a result:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Speed limits
> > > > > > > > > > Stopping for a red light Stopping for a stop sign 
> > > > > > > > > > Passing a school bus with red flashing lights 
> > > > > > > > > > Passing another vehicle without a 'dotted line'
> > > > > > > > > > Building code violations Purjury
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > And those are the just the ones I thought of in the 
> > > > > > > > > > car on the way
> > > > > > > home
> > > > > > > > > > from a client site.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:11 AM, LRS Scout 
> > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The first is a property crime as soon as they 
> > > > > > > > > > > enter your
> > > > land.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The second is a crime, but with waivers and the 
> > > > > > > > > > > like shouldn't
> > > > > > be.
> > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 8, 2013 9:09 AM, "Scott Stroz"
> > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > If someone picks a lock on your home, does not 
> > > > > > > > > > > > damage the lock
> > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > > all,
> > > > > > > > > > > > touches nothing but the floor as they walk 
> > > > > > > > > > > > through your house,
> > > > > > > then
> > > > > > > > > > > leaves
> > > > > > > > > > > > without taking or damaging anything...has a 
> > > > > > > > > > > > crime been
> > > > > > committed?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Based on your previous answers, we should assume 
> > > > > > > > > > > > you will
> > > > > > answer
> > > > > > > > 'no'
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > If a person without a medical license practices 
> > > > > > > > > > > > medicine, is it
> > > > > > > > only
> > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > crime when/unless someone gets hurt form their
> actions?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Based on your previous answers, we should assume 
> > > > > > > > > > > > you will
> > > > > > answer
> > > > > > > > > 'yes'
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:05 AM, LRS Scout 
> > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > We didn't?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Ask Louis Farrakhan.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Ask a meeting of the sons of confederate 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > soldiers, a meeting
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > hibernians, or a native American.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Ask me. No crimes, no warrant, they came in my 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > home, they
> > > > > > laid
> > > > > > > > > hands
> > > > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > > > me
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and they took my property.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 8, 2013 8:59 AM, "Justin Scott" <
> > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Obviously you are court I'm how these 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > things are
> > > > > > currently
> > > > > > > > > > > > implemented,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm saying is wrong, its immoral.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > When I was active with the Libertarian Party 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > a decade ago I
> > > > > > > > might
> > > > > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > agreed with you.  Since then I have seen too 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > many people
> > > > > > die
> > > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > > drug
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > overdoses or killed by drunk drivers to 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > continue with that
> > > > > > > line
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > reasoning.  That kind of thinking was better 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > suited to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 250
> > > > > > > > years
> > > > > > > > > > ago
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > when we didn't have the individual ability 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to so easily
> > > > > > > inflict
> > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > much damage on ourselves or one another.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365379
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to