And I feel it is just as likely that Zimmerman 'started it' and Martin was
defending himself.
On Jul 22, 2013 4:56 PM, "Sam" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Trayvon was walking very close to the houses appearing as if looking to
> burgal one. That was probably to avoid much of the rain but still
> suspicious. The problem was he didn't like being profiled so he "likely"
> decided to pummel the "white" guy that was dissing him. If he didn't attack
> Zimmerman this wouldn't have happened. The only other thing I could thing
> of was Zimmerman deciding to take him down but that doesn't make sense.
>
> .
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:49 PM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > I agree as well, that he definitely did not intend to kill.
> >
> > Which is why it should have been manslaughter.
> >
> > A kid who was minding his own business is dead, and it's Zimmerman's
> fault
> > that he is dead. I simply can't get past that. I don't think Zim is a bad
> > guy or a premeditated murderer, but I think he fucked up by not listening
> > to the dispatche'rs advice, and now a kid is dead. I think he should pay
> > SOME price for that.
> >
> > Trayvon was no prince, but he didn't deserve to die because he was
> walking
> > home with a hooded sweatshirt. If Zimmerman would have just left him
> alone,
> > he'd be alive. That's a fact that can't be disputed.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:49 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Yup agreed
> > >
> > > Dumb move
> > >
> > > Lots of dumb shit isn't illegal.
> > > On Jul 22, 2013 3:45 PM, "Sam" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > So agreed Zimmerman screwed up, but he never intended to kill. Do you
> > > > agree?
> > > >
> > > > .
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there a witness that saw Martin 'attack' first? As far as I
> know,
> > > > there
> > > > > is not.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, for that little piece of the puzzle, we have only Zimmerman's
> > word
> > > > on.
> > > > > Zimmerman. The one who shot and killed the other guy. Do you not
> > think
> > > he
> > > > > would have good reason to lie about it?
> > > > >
> > > > > Here is something I feel safe in assuming. Had Zimmerman stayed in
> > his
> > > > car
> > > > > and not followed Martin would be alive and none of this would ever
> > have
> > > > > happened.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:37 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Without having been there and seeing it or being in Zimmerman's
> > head
> > > > your
> > > > > > statements and Larry's have no basis I'm fact and still sound
> based
> > > off
> > > > > the
> > > > > > faulty reporting.
> > > > > > On Jul 22, 2013 3:35 PM, "Scott Stroz" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Am I missing something? George Zimmerman did in fact follow ( I
> > > would
> > > > > say
> > > > > > > 'stalk' but some people did not like the use of that word),
> shoot
> > > and
> > > > > > kill
> > > > > > > a minor, correct?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There is no picking apart those facts.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Revolution <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Are you implying that because he was found 'not guilty'
> that
> > he
> > > > did
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > fact stalk, shoot and kill an unarmed person?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > sounds like someone is trying to pick the facts apart
> > > > > > > > so they can stick a dull knife where it doesn't belong.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Jul 22, 2013, at 2:39 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Tim -
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Are you implying that because he was found 'not guilty'
> that
> > he
> > > > did
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > fact stalk, shoot and kill an unarmed person?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I never mentioned the verdict, merely the details of the
> > > > incident.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:19 PM, LRS Scout <
> > [email protected]
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Really?
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> I'm pretty sure our judicial system disagreed with you.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Not even a hung jury.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Not guilty.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> The cops didn't even want to arrest him, they were made
> to.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> But you know better right?
> > > > > > > > >> On Jul 22, 2013 2:17 PM, "Scott Stroz" <[email protected]
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> He is. 'Rescuing' 4 people with no injuries does not
> negate
> > > > that
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > fact
> > > > > > > > >>> that he stalked, shot and killed an unarmed person.
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:13 PM, LRS Scout <
> > > [email protected]
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> What a monster.
> > > > > > > > >>>> On Jul 22, 2013 2:13 PM, "GMoney" <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> I thought this was an Onion headline when i first saw
> > > > it....but
> > > > > > > > >>>> apparently
> > > > > > > > >>>>> not!
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://abcnews.go.com/US/george-zimmerman-emerged-hiding-rescue-family-trapped-suv/story?id=19735432
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365798
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to